<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mangled smiley in @font-face</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.w3conversions.com/2011/01/mangled-smiley-in-font-face/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.w3conversions.com/2011/01/mangled-smiley-in-font-face/</link>
	<description>realizations on life, the web, and everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 06:43:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Irish</title>
		<link>http://blog.w3conversions.com/2011/01/mangled-smiley-in-font-face/comment-page-1/#comment-3681</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Irish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 09:36:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.w3conversions.com/?p=868#comment-3681</guid>
		<description>Nice! Btw the apache config that ships with the HTML5 Boilerplate ensures a utf-8 serving of your CSS so you won&#039;t need to be that explicit inline.

And FWIW, the ugly garbledygook is just fine too. it does the same job. But I agree.. the smiley is way better. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice! Btw the apache config that ships with the HTML5 Boilerplate ensures a utf-8 serving of your CSS so you won&#8217;t need to be that explicit inline.</p>
<p>And FWIW, the ugly garbledygook is just fine too. it does the same job. But I agree.. the smiley is way better. <img src='http://blog.w3conversions.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
