<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Annoying Flash Banner Ads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.w3conversions.com/2006/06/annoying-flash-banner-ads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.w3conversions.com/2006/06/annoying-flash-banner-ads/</link>
	<description>realizations on life, the web, and everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2015 06:43:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom Muck</title>
		<link>http://blog.w3conversions.com/2006/06/annoying-flash-banner-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-3548</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Muck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 11:24:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitymx.com/blog/index.cfm?newsid=711#comment-3548</guid>
		<description>I disable Flash in my main browsing app. I had enough several years ago. I disable Acrobat too. I&#039;d rather download a file if it has to open in a plugin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disable Flash in my main browsing app. I had enough several years ago. I disable Acrobat too. I&#8217;d rather download a file if it has to open in a plugin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disgruntled Netizen</title>
		<link>http://blog.w3conversions.com/2006/06/annoying-flash-banner-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-3547</link>
		<dc:creator>Disgruntled Netizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 10:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitymx.com/blog/index.cfm?newsid=711#comment-3547</guid>
		<description>I would also like to add (no pun), that the era of the pop-up and pop-under is pretty much over thanks to savvy browser developers. I believe that we could be shielded from nasty Flash-based ads with little work. Maybe Adobe or browser developers could allow ad designers to have an alternate text or image should a viewer decide not to have annoying flashy special effects enabled for advertisements.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When Flash ads play over your actual content, or float over menus, or do something else that could be considered malicious, it&#039;s gone too far.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would also like to add (no pun), that the era of the pop-up and pop-under is pretty much over thanks to savvy browser developers. I believe that we could be shielded from nasty Flash-based ads with little work. Maybe Adobe or browser developers could allow ad designers to have an alternate text or image should a viewer decide not to have annoying flashy special effects enabled for advertisements.</p>
<p>When Flash ads play over your actual content, or float over menus, or do something else that could be considered malicious, it&#8217;s gone too far.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Disgruntled Netizen</title>
		<link>http://blog.w3conversions.com/2006/06/annoying-flash-banner-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-3546</link>
		<dc:creator>Disgruntled Netizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 10:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitymx.com/blog/index.cfm?newsid=711#comment-3546</guid>
		<description>I found this page Googling for &#039;Flash based advertisement annoying&#039; to see if I could find any plug-ins to disable this garbage (since Macromedia/Adobe never thought to implement a &quot;block content&quot; feature in the context menu). These ads not only use bandwidth that I am paying for, waste my already taxed CPU cycles, and take up space on my hard drive, but commercialize everything on the Internet making it hard to find anything authored by actual talented people rather than no-names paid to read from boring scripts for an easy job. Also, they waste a lot of my time, and for someone who works full time, time is very precious, not something to be wasted viewing info on something that&#039;s not interesting.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I miss the days of the text-based ad, those I could tolerate, and those I would click on if something interested me, but begging for my attention in the equivalent of a TV commercial irritates the hell out of me and I would never purchase anything from the advertiser who irritates me ever.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Studies on to who pays attention to what part of the page are pretentious, and themselves are only made so someone can make money to make the study itself. If something is actually worth selling, a text based add under the menu will suffice. Otherwise it&#039;s just annoying content wasting my resources that needs to be blocked permanently. So long as an ad is visible, it can be seen. It doesn&#039;t need to be obnoxious otherwise steps need to be taken to make sure that it is never seen ever (by anyone, we need a built-in spam database for our browsers supported by the manufacturers of such browsers, we need to bring the net back to it&#039;s past glory where ads were bandwidth conscious and text-based!) Maybe that will never happen, but I for one won&#039;t be putting up with increasingly annoying ads being forced upon me against my will when all I want is useful content.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These days I seem to have to watch 30 seconds of streaming video advertising something every time I click a link, or have a bunch of animated stuff slowing down the page, in a year there will probably be twelve one-minute advertisements per click for five seconds worth of actual content. Unacceptable, we need stronger protection.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I understand that some sites need the money from ads to operate, even if the owners have real jobs, but there has to be a better way than Flash, and I think if Flash based advertisements lost their prominence, text-based ads and static images would once again become valuable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The only reason I even have Flash installed is because a lot of actual content makes use of it, but that fact seems to be getting exploited more and more to it&#039;s fullest and it&#039;s getting to be unacceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found this page Googling for &#8216;Flash based advertisement annoying&#8217; to see if I could find any plug-ins to disable this garbage (since Macromedia/Adobe never thought to implement a &#8220;block content&#8221; feature in the context menu). These ads not only use bandwidth that I am paying for, waste my already taxed CPU cycles, and take up space on my hard drive, but commercialize everything on the Internet making it hard to find anything authored by actual talented people rather than no-names paid to read from boring scripts for an easy job. Also, they waste a lot of my time, and for someone who works full time, time is very precious, not something to be wasted viewing info on something that&#8217;s not interesting.</p>
<p>I miss the days of the text-based ad, those I could tolerate, and those I would click on if something interested me, but begging for my attention in the equivalent of a TV commercial irritates the hell out of me and I would never purchase anything from the advertiser who irritates me ever.</p>
<p>Studies on to who pays attention to what part of the page are pretentious, and themselves are only made so someone can make money to make the study itself. If something is actually worth selling, a text based add under the menu will suffice. Otherwise it&#8217;s just annoying content wasting my resources that needs to be blocked permanently. So long as an ad is visible, it can be seen. It doesn&#8217;t need to be obnoxious otherwise steps need to be taken to make sure that it is never seen ever (by anyone, we need a built-in spam database for our browsers supported by the manufacturers of such browsers, we need to bring the net back to it&#8217;s past glory where ads were bandwidth conscious and text-based!) Maybe that will never happen, but I for one won&#8217;t be putting up with increasingly annoying ads being forced upon me against my will when all I want is useful content.</p>
<p>These days I seem to have to watch 30 seconds of streaming video advertising something every time I click a link, or have a bunch of animated stuff slowing down the page, in a year there will probably be twelve one-minute advertisements per click for five seconds worth of actual content. Unacceptable, we need stronger protection.</p>
<p>I understand that some sites need the money from ads to operate, even if the owners have real jobs, but there has to be a better way than Flash, and I think if Flash based advertisements lost their prominence, text-based ads and static images would once again become valuable.</p>
<p>The only reason I even have Flash installed is because a lot of actual content makes use of it, but that fact seems to be getting exploited more and more to it&#8217;s fullest and it&#8217;s getting to be unacceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Arthur</title>
		<link>http://blog.w3conversions.com/2006/06/annoying-flash-banner-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-3545</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitymx.com/blog/index.cfm?newsid=711#comment-3545</guid>
		<description>-I too highly dislike the new version of these ads, as you say, the ones that cover up the rest of the page. The trouble is, us geeks like new toys and have to use them. A lot of the time they are impractical, but since it is a way to show off something new in a technical sense, the tech demonstration becomes more important than the user experience. Seems to me we have the process backwards. We need to move the user back into first place and put our skills and new discoveries on the shelf.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-I too highly dislike the new version of these ads, as you say, the ones that cover up the rest of the page. The trouble is, us geeks like new toys and have to use them. A lot of the time they are impractical, but since it is a way to show off something new in a technical sense, the tech demonstration becomes more important than the user experience. Seems to me we have the process backwards. We need to move the user back into first place and put our skills and new discoveries on the shelf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JesterXL</title>
		<link>http://blog.w3conversions.com/2006/06/annoying-flash-banner-ads/comment-page-1/#comment-3544</link>
		<dc:creator>JesterXL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jun 2006 15:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communitymx.com/blog/index.cfm?newsid=711#comment-3544</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.jessewarden.com/archives/2004/04/how_to_disable.html&quot;&gt;This &lt;/a&gt; should help.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.jessewarden.com/archives/2004/04/how_to_disable.html">This </a> should help.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
